The 75D and 90D left a huge gap between them, and Mercedes has managed to capitalize on that very sore spot. Tesla buying is more like joining a tribal movement than an actual logical choice. Very, very smart by the Germans, but is it enough to take on Musk’s costliest offering? It’s a blob. Performance-wise, this Mercedes would be best placed near the Tesla Model X 100D — ready with 417 hp (311 kW) and 660 Nm (487 lb-ft) of torque. It may interest you: VIDEO: Tesla, we analyze all your models one by one, and also the prototypes. Tesla Model X und Tesla Model S gebraucht kaufen – Alternativen zu Mercedes-Benz EQC und Audi e-tron. We find out which is best. Read our full review on the 2020 Mercedes-Benz EQC. Compare Mercedes-Benz EQC vs Tesla Model Y. Der Jaguar I-Pace hingegen ist ein hochgelegter Shooting-Brake und das Tesla Model X ein wuchtiger Van mit abfallender Dachlinie. Tesla didn’t want to share this info publicly; all we know is that the Model X has room for seven, and a maximum cargo volume of 2,492 l (with the second and third rows of seats folded). It is powered by a 75 kWh lithium ion battery with which it achieves an autonomy of up to 505 km without … See Mat's behind the scenes video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFETTYGgMr0&t=4sThis is the Mercedes EQC! Electric SUV megatest: Mercedes EQC vs luxury rivals Merc's EV faces a tough, real-world test against rivals, the Audi E-tron, Jaguar I-Pace and Tesla Model X Share By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. In the competition of Tesla Model 3 Vs Audi E-Tron Vs Mercedes EQC Vs Jaguar iPace Vs Kia Niro Vs Nissan Leaf, which one do you think will last … And if that’s not enough and you want to hook a trailer to your electric SUV, learn that the Model X can tow 2,250 kg (4,960 lb) while the EQC is limited to just 1,800 kg (3,968 lb). The Mercedes Me app helps you control the car’s “pre-entry climate” and gives you most of the BEV insights mentioned above. It has a 90-kWh battery pack and delivers 255 miles when fully charged. The Model X has a huge touchscreen for most of its work, while the EQC still retains its buttons, and so on. Here, though, the MBUX infotainment system also shows BEV-specific info like range, current flow, charging status, and the lot. Grumpy for what, EQC? Tesla Model Y vs. Polestar 2, I-Pace, E-Tron and Mercedes EQC: How do they stack up? While they have always had polarizing opinions, there’s no denying that this could be the deciding factor for people who are suckers for wing doors. Well, the 90D delivers 503 horses and 487 pound-feet of torque. For instance, the Model X comes with simple, contemporary, and minimalist looks, while the EQC has got the pizzazz. Tesla’s days of bullying the kids in this segment seem to be nearing its end. The Merc EQC is a very important car. We throw in some details about the Audi E-Tron, Jaguar I-Pace and Mercedes-Benz EQC, too. The EQC doesn't seem to have a substantial edge over the Model X in terms of capability, but the pricing would allegedly turn the tides in Merc's favors. Head-on, the two behemoths have contrasting designs. Mercedes-Benz: Unsurprisingly, each brand’s design philosophy is front and center in these products. The German automaker has targeted the Model X in a way that you just cannot fairly compare the two. 令人喜出望外的是，價錢相比eqc親民得多，會否令打算換電動車的你心動？ Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 vs Tesla Model 3
MB勝在品牌效應？ - FEATURES - TopGear The EQC does it in 4.9 seconds and is electronically limited to a top speed of 112 mph (180 km/h) top speed, t… However, it’s the technology that’s the most impressive aspect of the cabin. Als het gaat om bouwkwaliteit pakt de Mercedes-Benz EQC echt een voorsprong op de concurrentie. Power is sent to all the wheels, but power output is much lower than the EQC at 328 horses and 387 pound-feet of torque. Mercedes is finally here with its trump card in the electric crossover segment – the Mercedes-Benz EQC. But it’s the side that is the Model X’s strongest-selling point – the falcon wing doors. With a 75 kWh pack, it is able to deliver 247 miles of range. Furthermore, the sat-nav is optimized for electric use (and recharge) by calculating your routes depending on the total charging time. Even Mufflers would’ve added character to the rear; fake ones, obviously. Tesla is confidently described as the safest SUV ever, boasting a five-star safety rating. Gebrauchte Tesla-Elektrofahrzeuge bieten klare Vorteile gegenüber der deutschen Konkurrenz. The Model X looks like a grown-up mouse on wheels, with small headlights and a single slat grille that looks very contemporary. technischer Daten und Praxiswerte wie Verbrauch und Reichweite. Fog lamps are found on the corners of the bumper. Just like the front, even the rear of both the cars are significantly different. Polestar 2 vs. Tesla Model 3: How do these EVs stack up? 402 hp (300 kW) and 765 Nm (564 lb-ft) are the power and torque output of the all-new Mercedes-Benz EQC. Id4 und Benz EQC vs Tesla. It races from 0-60 mph in 4.9 seconds as well, but has a higher top speed of 130 mph. > Seht euch das nur an. 2021 Mercedes-Benz EQC vs Tesla Model X. Firstly, Tesla Model X can be quoted as the best car in this segment. Cons Moderate driving range Back seats and boot nothing special Front suspension can get crashy Select configuration: EQC 400. Zum gleichen Zeitpunkt könnten auch Aiways, Byton und Nio dem EQC das Leben für Preise ab 50.000 Euro schwermachen. Sidd joined the Topspeed.com team in 2017 as an intern and in less than a year he earned a full-time position as an associate editor and junior automotive expert. Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC: Tesla Model Y Performance: Reichweite WLTP (Kombiniert) 462 km: 480 km: Reichweite Praxis: 335 km: 350 km: Verbrauch WLTP (Kombiniert) 20,1 kWh / 100 km: 18,3 kWh / 100 km: Verbrauch Praxis: 24,0 kWh / 100 km: 20,7 kWh / 100 km The king of the jungle finally has stiff competition (no offense, Jaguar lovers! But it's not the only one of its kind, nor the first, so being pretty doesn't cut it. The specs seem a mixed bag, though. Well, the Model X has even longer one; longer by 91 mm! Pros Quiet, wafting driving experience Loaded with cabin tech Outstanding safety credentials Understated design a genuine point of difference. Power is sent to all the wheels. The EQC, on the other hand, can barely pass by without getting noticed, thanks to the huge grille with the Mercedes-Benz logo slapped right in the middle. That's why we've pitched it against the Tesla Model X wonderkid and see how they compare on paper. The Model X 100D can sprint to 60 mph (96 km/h) in 4.7 seconds. There are also differences in terms of engines: there are two power levels (only one in the EQC): the Great Autonomy, with two electric motors (256 and 200 CV) that, combined, throw 351 CV of power. Mercedes-Benz among the electric vehicles, Mercedes-Benz EQC vs Jaguar I-Pace: how they fare on paper. Then there are funky blue-LED headlights that are connected by a slat that runs all the way from one headlight to the other. It comes with Side Collision Warning, and Emergency Braking assists as standard, and its Autopilot feature enhances that with 12 ultrasonic sensors, a 250 m forward facing radar, and 360-degree visibility through its rear-, side- and forward-facing cameras. $67,900. The age of the long-range, posh, fast, electric SUV is here. Safety-wise, the EQC hosts the plethora of safety bits you can find on every other Merc, plus some more: there’s a Driving Assistance pack that features, among other things, Active Tailback Assist that will reduce the speed to around 100 km/h (62 mph) if tailback is detected ahead. The EQC follows the ‘connected lights’ pattern at the back as well. Mercedes-Benz EQS vs Tesla Model S: Specifications Comparison The Mercedes-Benz EQS is entering a space that was so far heavily monopolised by the very popular Tesla Model S. So, let's look at all the facts and figures and see where does the new EQS stand against the Model S on paper. Optik, Leistung, Preis Darum geht es doch garnicht. Polestar 2 vs. Tesla Model 3: How do these EVs stack up? As for the 279-mile range, we will wait for the official EPA rating before jumping to conclusions. 18 Oct 2018. All three rows are practical to use, unlike the namesake last row seats in most SUVs. Less successful is the EQC’s front fascia, with its oddly shaped grille and headlights, as well a… Yes, I know the EQC is a lot heavier (2425kg kerb weight), but even the Tesla Model 3 was notably more efficient (18.5kWh/100km) than the EQC over very similar terrain and driving. Other than that, you can find the Tesla logo and air dams on either side of the bumper. Im Vergleichstest setzen die deutschen Audi e-tron und Mercdes EQC auf klassische SUV-Formen. The EQC does it in 4.9 seconds and is electronically limited to a top speed of 112 mph (180 km/h) top speed, thus making it 43 mph (69 km/h) slower than the Model X — which is limited at 155 mph (250 km/h). However, our testing saw us return an even better consumption rate than Mercedes-Benz’s claimed figure, which is 21.4kWh/100km. 2020 Mercedes-Benz EQC. Starting Price (MSRP) 8.8. The steeply raked windshield makes the SUV look stouter than it actually is, much like the Range Rover Evoque. Voorsprong door bouwkwaliteit. Vergleich des Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC gegen Tesla Model X Standard Range inkl. SEE MORE: Mercedes-Benz EQC vs Jaguar I-Pace: how they fare on paper, https://cdn.drivemag.net/images/editors/author-avatar.svg. What we know about the EQC so far is that it uses two 10.25 in (26 cm) tablet-like screens, just like the rest of the Mercedes family. Mercedes-Benz’s more conservative look gets an update for electric duty, but this is still a low-key vehicle that has no problem blending into the background. The Germans are coming for Tesla, and it may not be long before a hard-fought battle begins. The bonnet overhang and the long wheelbase catch your attention immediately, and it looks butch. Performance-wise, this Mercedes would be best placed near the Tesla Model X 100D — ready with 417 hp (311 kW) and 660 Nm (487 lb-ft) of torque. Ja, ich weiß und habe es selbst schon im Forum propagiert: Ein Vergleich Tesla Model 3 vs Mercedes EQC 400 verbietet sich eigentlich, da es sich um … Read our full review on the 2017 Tesla Model X. Javascript must be enabled for the correct page display. He is currently our pickup truck expert and focuses his attention on heavy-duty and off-road vehicles. The Tesla product has a comparatively smaller bonnet. The Mercedes EQC comes equipped with a dual motor setup that churns out 402 horses and 564 pound-feet of torque. Everything sits nicely in the hands and the car is ergonomically-sound. Prices are yet to be announced for the EQC; the Model X (in 100D guise) will set you back €97,080 (in Germany) and $96,000 (in the US). The "Mercedes-Benz among the electric vehicles" (as is the EQC spoiled by its parents) is here, a handsome addition to the BEV universe if you ask us. All Rights Reserved, Introducing the $1000 TopSpeed Student Scholarship. Just like its German rival, the Model X shows all the BEV-relevant info, also shown via a mobile app as well. © Copyright TopSpeed. Tesla owner, hardcore EV fan, and popular YouTuber Bjørn Nyland uses the Tesla Model X for comparison as he tests the charging speed of the all-new Audi e-tron, Jaguar I … The 75D doesn’t seem that competent, right? Step inside the EQC’s cabin and you’ll feel as though you’ve jumped into the future. While Tesla gets a no non-sense taillight set, it is rather boring; function-over-form at its best. The EQC will run a version of MBUX which we've already experienced in the new A-Class as well as the new G-Class. the I-Pace is good too) in terms of looks, practicality, and performance. Yes, I know the EQC is a lot heavier (2425kg kerb weight), but even the Tesla Model 3 was notably more efficient (18.5kWh/100km) than the EQC over very similar terrain and driving. Let us know in the comments section below. Going by the initial impressions, this will be a very close fight between the two automakers; and not to forget, we have the Jaguar i-Pace, as well as the Audi e-tron to play spoilsports between the battle of the giants. While it is not as quick, or as fast as the Model X, the EQC makes up in the electric range department, being able to go as far as 280 miles (450 km) on a single charge. The EQC looks like a conventional SUV when looked from the sides. Mercedes-Benz EQC vs. Tesla Model X vs. Jaguar I-Pace EV交鋒(下) Posted 28/08/20. Mercedes has taken on the Tesla Model X quite strategically. On 4 September, when the whole world was excited to witness the launch of this beast, there was one particular nervous face as well - the face that has been dominating the e-crossover market for quite some time now – The Tesla Model X. The Tesla Model X looks futuristic and simple at the same time. Paul Horrell. Tesla’s Autopilot is the icing on the tech-rich cake. With a 17 in diagonal, it’s one of the biggest screens embedded in a modern vehicle. Spätestens mit dem Model Y von Tesla steht zudem ein weiterer Konkurrent in den Startlöchern, der dem EQC beim Nutzwert gleichkommt, ihn bei der Reichweite übertrifft und dabei deutlich weniger Geld kostet. Ook de infotainment is van het hoogste niveau en kan via de aanraakschermen of met stemcommando’s bediend worden. Het interieur is beter afgewerkt dan een Tesla Model X en valt op met fraaie stiksels, sierpanelen en sfeerverlichting. But the first one to launch an EQ sub-brand that’ll duel the VW’s ID family, the next gen of iBMWs, and yep, Tesla. It will go from naught to 60 mph in 4.9 seconds, and top out at 112 mph. After spending time with the New Mercedes EQC, time to decide which car is better? However, our testing saw us return an even better consumption rate than Mercedes-Benz’s claimed figure, which is 21.4kWh/100km. With its length rated at 4,761 mm, the Mercedes-Benz EQC is around 300 mm (11 in) shorter than the Model X, but their wheelbases are quite similar (2,873 mm for EQC, and 2,965 mm for Model X). The EQC is also a spacious seven-seater, which we can confirm without any official pictures, thanks to its longer height and width when compared to the Model X. by: ... Tesla Model S. 37. How can we not compare the two? We’ll update this bit as soon as Mercedes details the EQC’s safety specs. Tesla's new, smaller electric crossover has lots of competition. As such, we've decided to compare on paper the Mercedes-Benz EQC 400, the Jaguar I-Pace S and the Tesla Model X 75D: All three are dual-motor EVs, though the Tesla is … > In jeder hinsicht unterlegen. The Tesla Model X 75D is the closest competitor to the EQC in terms of battery pack capacity. Here's what we know. It was natural for the Model X to be threatened by a car which has a name that stands for ‘Electric Intelligence’. The Tesla Model X 75D is the closest competitor to the EQC in terms of battery pack capacity. The Tesla Model X is quite spacious; both in terms of seating and storage. 402 hp (300 kW) and 765 Nm (564 lb-ft) are the power and torque output of the all-new Mercedes-Benz EQC. The Model X 100D can sprint to 60 mph (96 km/h) in 4.7 seconds. With a 75 kWh pack, it is able to deliver 247 miles of range. Audi e-tron, Jaguar I-Pace, Mercedes EQC und Tesla Model X im Vergleichstest. Jag I-Pace, Merc EQC, Tesla Model X and Audi e-tron: how do they compare? At the Tesla superchargers (120 kWh), the Audi e-tron charges quicker than the Mercedes EQC or the Jaguar I-Pace and where there are no DC stations, the Audi performs better at the AC stations. While the power is perhaps the best in the segment, the 65-kWh battery pack feels inadequate for such a powerful car. The center console is dominated by a huge 17-inch, vertically mounted touchscreen that controls basically everything in the car; right from the vehicle status, to settings, to air-control, to entertainment, to navigation, etc. Nevertheless, we can safely conclude that this is what the future will look like. Not that it looks it. It's called the EQC and is targeted at the Jaguar I-Pace, Tesla Model X, and imminent Audi e-tron. Wenn ab 2030 Verbrenner verboten und durch Elektroautos ersetzt werden sollen (Ich rechne eher mit 2050-2070), brauchen wir weder Porsche noch derzeitige Tesla. Ja, ich weiß und habe es selbst schon im Forum propagiert: Ein Vergleich Tesla Model 3 vs Mercedes EQC 400 verbietet sich eigentlich, da es sich um … Tesla’s infotainment system is one of the freshest, coolest things you can get in a car — it even has Easter eggs! In fact, when looking at it dead-straight, the Model X actually looks like a sedan. We like the conventional profile, which more or less mirrors the GLC-Classcrossover. Mercedes-Benz EQC und Audi e-tron positionieren sich klar gegen das Tesla Model X. Im direkten Vergleich können die Fahrzeuge aber nur schwer mithalten. Did we say the EQC has a long wheelbase? What are your thoughts? Model X 100D is 20 miles short here, with a claimed 260-mile (418 km) range. Even though the car has a pretty basic body structure that will please all and offend none, it is not something that would make you smile five years down the line every time you see it. It is due to the fact that it was one of the first mass-producer of electric cars and well their bold move paid off well. However, EQC has outperformed Tesla … All Rights Reserved, � Copyright TopSpeed. With dimensions similar to the GLC, the EQC has enough room in the cabin for five adults, courtesy of a 2.8 m long wheelbase; plus, some 500 l of cargo space in the back. corrupted pixel 18th Jun 2020 Jaguar for sure, 300-400kg … Mercedes EQC vs Audi e-tron The Mercedes EQC and Audi e-tron are two premium electric SUVs spearheading the EV revolution.
MB勝在品牌效應？ - FEATURES - TopGear The EQC does it in 4.9 seconds and is electronically limited to a top speed of 112 mph (180 km/h) top speed, t… However, it’s the technology that’s the most impressive aspect of the cabin. Als het gaat om bouwkwaliteit pakt de Mercedes-Benz EQC echt een voorsprong op de concurrentie. Power is sent to all the wheels, but power output is much lower than the EQC at 328 horses and 387 pound-feet of torque. Mercedes is finally here with its trump card in the electric crossover segment – the Mercedes-Benz EQC. But it’s the side that is the Model X’s strongest-selling point – the falcon wing doors. With a 75 kWh pack, it is able to deliver 247 miles of range. Furthermore, the sat-nav is optimized for electric use (and recharge) by calculating your routes depending on the total charging time. Even Mufflers would’ve added character to the rear; fake ones, obviously. Tesla is confidently described as the safest SUV ever, boasting a five-star safety rating. Gebrauchte Tesla-Elektrofahrzeuge bieten klare Vorteile gegenüber der deutschen Konkurrenz. The Model X looks like a grown-up mouse on wheels, with small headlights and a single slat grille that looks very contemporary. technischer Daten und Praxiswerte wie Verbrauch und Reichweite. Fog lamps are found on the corners of the bumper. Just like the front, even the rear of both the cars are significantly different. Polestar 2 vs. Tesla Model 3: How do these EVs stack up? 402 hp (300 kW) and 765 Nm (564 lb-ft) are the power and torque output of the all-new Mercedes-Benz EQC. Id4 und Benz EQC vs Tesla. It races from 0-60 mph in 4.9 seconds as well, but has a higher top speed of 130 mph. > Seht euch das nur an. 2021 Mercedes-Benz EQC vs Tesla Model X. Firstly, Tesla Model X can be quoted as the best car in this segment. Cons Moderate driving range Back seats and boot nothing special Front suspension can get crashy Select configuration: EQC 400. Zum gleichen Zeitpunkt könnten auch Aiways, Byton und Nio dem EQC das Leben für Preise ab 50.000 Euro schwermachen. Sidd joined the Topspeed.com team in 2017 as an intern and in less than a year he earned a full-time position as an associate editor and junior automotive expert. Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC: Tesla Model Y Performance: Reichweite WLTP (Kombiniert) 462 km: 480 km: Reichweite Praxis: 335 km: 350 km: Verbrauch WLTP (Kombiniert) 20,1 kWh / 100 km: 18,3 kWh / 100 km: Verbrauch Praxis: 24,0 kWh / 100 km: 20,7 kWh / 100 km The king of the jungle finally has stiff competition (no offense, Jaguar lovers! But it's not the only one of its kind, nor the first, so being pretty doesn't cut it. The specs seem a mixed bag, though. Well, the Model X has even longer one; longer by 91 mm! Pros Quiet, wafting driving experience Loaded with cabin tech Outstanding safety credentials Understated design a genuine point of difference. Power is sent to all the wheels. The EQC, on the other hand, can barely pass by without getting noticed, thanks to the huge grille with the Mercedes-Benz logo slapped right in the middle. That's why we've pitched it against the Tesla Model X wonderkid and see how they compare on paper. The Model X 100D can sprint to 60 mph (96 km/h) in 4.7 seconds. There are also differences in terms of engines: there are two power levels (only one in the EQC): the Great Autonomy, with two electric motors (256 and 200 CV) that, combined, throw 351 CV of power. Mercedes-Benz among the electric vehicles, Mercedes-Benz EQC vs Jaguar I-Pace: how they fare on paper. Then there are funky blue-LED headlights that are connected by a slat that runs all the way from one headlight to the other. It comes with Side Collision Warning, and Emergency Braking assists as standard, and its Autopilot feature enhances that with 12 ultrasonic sensors, a 250 m forward facing radar, and 360-degree visibility through its rear-, side- and forward-facing cameras. $67,900. The age of the long-range, posh, fast, electric SUV is here. Safety-wise, the EQC hosts the plethora of safety bits you can find on every other Merc, plus some more: there’s a Driving Assistance pack that features, among other things, Active Tailback Assist that will reduce the speed to around 100 km/h (62 mph) if tailback is detected ahead. The EQC follows the ‘connected lights’ pattern at the back as well. Mercedes-Benz EQS vs Tesla Model S: Specifications Comparison The Mercedes-Benz EQS is entering a space that was so far heavily monopolised by the very popular Tesla Model S. So, let's look at all the facts and figures and see where does the new EQS stand against the Model S on paper. Optik, Leistung, Preis Darum geht es doch garnicht. Polestar 2 vs. Tesla Model 3: How do these EVs stack up? As for the 279-mile range, we will wait for the official EPA rating before jumping to conclusions. 18 Oct 2018. All three rows are practical to use, unlike the namesake last row seats in most SUVs. Less successful is the EQC’s front fascia, with its oddly shaped grille and headlights, as well a… Yes, I know the EQC is a lot heavier (2425kg kerb weight), but even the Tesla Model 3 was notably more efficient (18.5kWh/100km) than the EQC over very similar terrain and driving. Other than that, you can find the Tesla logo and air dams on either side of the bumper. Im Vergleichstest setzen die deutschen Audi e-tron und Mercdes EQC auf klassische SUV-Formen. The EQC does it in 4.9 seconds and is electronically limited to a top speed of 112 mph (180 km/h) top speed, thus making it 43 mph (69 km/h) slower than the Model X — which is limited at 155 mph (250 km/h). However, our testing saw us return an even better consumption rate than Mercedes-Benz’s claimed figure, which is 21.4kWh/100km. 2020 Mercedes-Benz EQC. Starting Price (MSRP) 8.8. The steeply raked windshield makes the SUV look stouter than it actually is, much like the Range Rover Evoque. Voorsprong door bouwkwaliteit. Vergleich des Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC gegen Tesla Model X Standard Range inkl. SEE MORE: Mercedes-Benz EQC vs Jaguar I-Pace: how they fare on paper, https://cdn.drivemag.net/images/editors/author-avatar.svg. What we know about the EQC so far is that it uses two 10.25 in (26 cm) tablet-like screens, just like the rest of the Mercedes family. Mercedes-Benz’s more conservative look gets an update for electric duty, but this is still a low-key vehicle that has no problem blending into the background. The Germans are coming for Tesla, and it may not be long before a hard-fought battle begins. The bonnet overhang and the long wheelbase catch your attention immediately, and it looks butch. Performance-wise, this Mercedes would be best placed near the Tesla Model X 100D — ready with 417 hp (311 kW) and 660 Nm (487 lb-ft) of torque. Ja, ich weiß und habe es selbst schon im Forum propagiert: Ein Vergleich Tesla Model 3 vs Mercedes EQC 400 verbietet sich eigentlich, da es sich um … Read our full review on the 2017 Tesla Model X. Javascript must be enabled for the correct page display. He is currently our pickup truck expert and focuses his attention on heavy-duty and off-road vehicles. The Tesla product has a comparatively smaller bonnet. The Mercedes EQC comes equipped with a dual motor setup that churns out 402 horses and 564 pound-feet of torque. Everything sits nicely in the hands and the car is ergonomically-sound. Prices are yet to be announced for the EQC; the Model X (in 100D guise) will set you back €97,080 (in Germany) and $96,000 (in the US). The "Mercedes-Benz among the electric vehicles" (as is the EQC spoiled by its parents) is here, a handsome addition to the BEV universe if you ask us. All Rights Reserved, Introducing the $1000 TopSpeed Student Scholarship. Just like its German rival, the Model X shows all the BEV-relevant info, also shown via a mobile app as well. © Copyright TopSpeed. Tesla owner, hardcore EV fan, and popular YouTuber Bjørn Nyland uses the Tesla Model X for comparison as he tests the charging speed of the all-new Audi e-tron, Jaguar I … The 75D doesn’t seem that competent, right? Step inside the EQC’s cabin and you’ll feel as though you’ve jumped into the future. While Tesla gets a no non-sense taillight set, it is rather boring; function-over-form at its best. The EQC will run a version of MBUX which we've already experienced in the new A-Class as well as the new G-Class. the I-Pace is good too) in terms of looks, practicality, and performance. Yes, I know the EQC is a lot heavier (2425kg kerb weight), but even the Tesla Model 3 was notably more efficient (18.5kWh/100km) than the EQC over very similar terrain and driving. Let us know in the comments section below. Going by the initial impressions, this will be a very close fight between the two automakers; and not to forget, we have the Jaguar i-Pace, as well as the Audi e-tron to play spoilsports between the battle of the giants. While it is not as quick, or as fast as the Model X, the EQC makes up in the electric range department, being able to go as far as 280 miles (450 km) on a single charge. The EQC looks like a conventional SUV when looked from the sides. Mercedes-Benz EQC vs. Tesla Model X vs. Jaguar I-Pace EV交鋒(下) Posted 28/08/20. Mercedes has taken on the Tesla Model X quite strategically. On 4 September, when the whole world was excited to witness the launch of this beast, there was one particular nervous face as well - the face that has been dominating the e-crossover market for quite some time now – The Tesla Model X. The Tesla Model X looks futuristic and simple at the same time. Paul Horrell. Tesla’s Autopilot is the icing on the tech-rich cake. With a 17 in diagonal, it’s one of the biggest screens embedded in a modern vehicle. Spätestens mit dem Model Y von Tesla steht zudem ein weiterer Konkurrent in den Startlöchern, der dem EQC beim Nutzwert gleichkommt, ihn bei der Reichweite übertrifft und dabei deutlich weniger Geld kostet. Ook de infotainment is van het hoogste niveau en kan via de aanraakschermen of met stemcommando’s bediend worden. Het interieur is beter afgewerkt dan een Tesla Model X en valt op met fraaie stiksels, sierpanelen en sfeerverlichting. But the first one to launch an EQ sub-brand that’ll duel the VW’s ID family, the next gen of iBMWs, and yep, Tesla. It will go from naught to 60 mph in 4.9 seconds, and top out at 112 mph. After spending time with the New Mercedes EQC, time to decide which car is better? However, our testing saw us return an even better consumption rate than Mercedes-Benz’s claimed figure, which is 21.4kWh/100km. With its length rated at 4,761 mm, the Mercedes-Benz EQC is around 300 mm (11 in) shorter than the Model X, but their wheelbases are quite similar (2,873 mm for EQC, and 2,965 mm for Model X). The EQC is also a spacious seven-seater, which we can confirm without any official pictures, thanks to its longer height and width when compared to the Model X. by: ... Tesla Model S. 37. How can we not compare the two? We’ll update this bit as soon as Mercedes details the EQC’s safety specs. Tesla's new, smaller electric crossover has lots of competition. As such, we've decided to compare on paper the Mercedes-Benz EQC 400, the Jaguar I-Pace S and the Tesla Model X 75D: All three are dual-motor EVs, though the Tesla is … > In jeder hinsicht unterlegen. The Tesla Model X 75D is the closest competitor to the EQC in terms of battery pack capacity. Here's what we know. It was natural for the Model X to be threatened by a car which has a name that stands for ‘Electric Intelligence’. The Tesla Model X 75D is the closest competitor to the EQC in terms of battery pack capacity. The Tesla Model X is quite spacious; both in terms of seating and storage. 402 hp (300 kW) and 765 Nm (564 lb-ft) are the power and torque output of the all-new Mercedes-Benz EQC. The Model X 100D can sprint to 60 mph (96 km/h) in 4.7 seconds. With a 75 kWh pack, it is able to deliver 247 miles of range. Audi e-tron, Jaguar I-Pace, Mercedes EQC und Tesla Model X im Vergleichstest. Jag I-Pace, Merc EQC, Tesla Model X and Audi e-tron: how do they compare? At the Tesla superchargers (120 kWh), the Audi e-tron charges quicker than the Mercedes EQC or the Jaguar I-Pace and where there are no DC stations, the Audi performs better at the AC stations. While the power is perhaps the best in the segment, the 65-kWh battery pack feels inadequate for such a powerful car. The center console is dominated by a huge 17-inch, vertically mounted touchscreen that controls basically everything in the car; right from the vehicle status, to settings, to air-control, to entertainment, to navigation, etc. Nevertheless, we can safely conclude that this is what the future will look like. Not that it looks it. It's called the EQC and is targeted at the Jaguar I-Pace, Tesla Model X, and imminent Audi e-tron. Wenn ab 2030 Verbrenner verboten und durch Elektroautos ersetzt werden sollen (Ich rechne eher mit 2050-2070), brauchen wir weder Porsche noch derzeitige Tesla. Ja, ich weiß und habe es selbst schon im Forum propagiert: Ein Vergleich Tesla Model 3 vs Mercedes EQC 400 verbietet sich eigentlich, da es sich um … Tesla’s infotainment system is one of the freshest, coolest things you can get in a car — it even has Easter eggs! In fact, when looking at it dead-straight, the Model X actually looks like a sedan. We like the conventional profile, which more or less mirrors the GLC-Classcrossover. Mercedes-Benz EQC und Audi e-tron positionieren sich klar gegen das Tesla Model X. Im direkten Vergleich können die Fahrzeuge aber nur schwer mithalten. Did we say the EQC has a long wheelbase? What are your thoughts? Model X 100D is 20 miles short here, with a claimed 260-mile (418 km) range. Even though the car has a pretty basic body structure that will please all and offend none, it is not something that would make you smile five years down the line every time you see it. It is due to the fact that it was one of the first mass-producer of electric cars and well their bold move paid off well. However, EQC has outperformed Tesla … All Rights Reserved, � Copyright TopSpeed. With dimensions similar to the GLC, the EQC has enough room in the cabin for five adults, courtesy of a 2.8 m long wheelbase; plus, some 500 l of cargo space in the back. corrupted pixel 18th Jun 2020 Jaguar for sure, 300-400kg … Mercedes EQC vs Audi e-tron The Mercedes EQC and Audi e-tron are two premium electric SUVs spearheading the EV revolution.